linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] kernel/reboot.c: export pm_power_off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 06:36:35 +0200
From:   Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        yibin.gong@....com, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-imx@....com,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] kernel/reboot.c: export pm_power_off_prepare

Hi Shawn,

On 11.09.2018 03:53, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:19:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:00:23AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>>>> I was expecting to get a pull request with the precursor patches in it -
>>>> the regulator driver seems to get a moderate amount of development so
>>>> there's a reasonable risk of conflicts.
>>
>>> What about you create a stable topic branch for regulator patches and I
>>> pull it into IMX tree?
>>
>> Sure, I can send a pull request back but the first two patches in the
>> series are ARM ones - are you OK with me just applying them and sending
>> them in the pull request or do you want to apply them first?
> 
> I just took another look at the series.  It seems that there is no
> build-time dependency between regulator and platform patches.  So I
> think we can handle the series like:
> 
>  - You apply patch #3, #4 and #5 on regulator tree;
>  - I apply the reset on IMX tree.
> 
> There shouldn't be any build or run time regression on either tree, and
> the feature that the series adds will be available when both trees get
> merged together on -next or Linus tree.
> 
> @Oleksij Is my understanding above correct?

Yes.



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)