[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8423cfb-2a23-1332-955f-6af5b0ddaecd@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:18:57 -0500
From: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <tony@...mide.com>, <sre@...nel.org>,
<nekit1000@...il.com>, <mpartap@....net>, <merlijn@...zup.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: ti-lmu: constify mfd_cell tables
Lee
On 09/11/2018 12:08 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Lee
>
> On 09/11/2018 10:57 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> Pavel
>>>
>>> On 09/07/2018 04:39 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>> On Wed 2018-08-29 11:31:08, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>>> From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
>>>>>
>>>>> mfd: ti-lmu: constify mfd_cell tables
>>>>>
>>>>> Add const attribute to all mfd_cell structures.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
>>>>
>>>> Lee, I guess this is for you to apply. Any news there?
>>>>
>>>> There are more patches ready,
>>>
>>> As I stated in another email thread. I don't see the need for this level of LMU framework.
>>>
>>> Here is the reference thread
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/982550/
>>
>> This driver has been present for 1.5 years.
>>
>> Is that a NACK for *this* patch or are you hijacking? :)
>>
>
> Its a NACK for adding this. I am pushing a new series for the LM3697 and will end up
> sending LED drivers for the non-MFD devices contained within. I will try to match the
> feature set the best I can.
>
Sorry it is a NACK for adding the backlight series. This patch is fine.
Dan
--
------------------
Dan Murphy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists