linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] dts: tc2: Update coresight bindings for hardware ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9cf11b0c-b5c0-b39d-8c57-ad7aea5c6212@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:23:21 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        robh@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        arm@...nel.org, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] dts: tc2: Update coresight bindings for hardware
 ports



On 11/09/18 18:15, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 09/11/2018 06:01 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:17:12AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>> Switch to the new coresight bindings
>>>
>>
>> I still see the below warnings:
>>
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb: Warning (graph_child_address):
>>     /replicator/in-ports: graph node has single child node 'port@0',
>>     #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
>> vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb: Warning (graph_child_address):
>>     /funnel@...40000/out-ports: graph node has single child node
>> 'port@0',
>>     #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary
>>
>> I need the below patch to fix them, let me know if it looks OK, I can
>> amend and apply.
> 
> Thanks for reporting. I purposefully added the "address-cells" and
> followed the format everywhere in the series thinking that, that is
> indeed the formal way of doing it, rather than having implicit port
> numbers. I can send an updated series fixing it everywhere.
> 
No need to post the update for TC2 unless it's different from what I
have proposed.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep