lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27559444-ca88-2c04-c85c-613116e9e51f@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:52:29 +0300
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] perf: Per PMU access controls (paranoid setting)


Hi,

Is there any plans or may be even progress on that so far?

Thanks,
Alexey

On 26.06.2018 18:36, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>
> 
> For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
> access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
> perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.
> 
> These work in equivalent fashion as the existing perf_event_paranoid
> sysctl, which now becomes the parent control for each PMU.
> 
> On PMU registration the global/parent value will be inherited by each PMU,
> as it will be propagated to all registered PMUs when the sysctl is
> updated.
> 
> At any later point individual PMU access controls, located in
> <sysfs>/device/<pmu-name>/perf_event_paranoid, can be adjusted to achieve
> fine grained access control.
> 
> Discussion from previous posting:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/21/156
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> 
> Tvrtko Ursulin (4):
>   perf: Move some access checks later in perf_event_open
>   perf: Pass pmu pointer to perf_paranoid_* helpers
>   perf: Allow per PMU access control
>   perf Documentation: Document the per PMU perf_event_paranoid interface
> 
>  .../sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events     |  14 +++
>  arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c               |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/events/intel/bts.c                   |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/events/intel/core.c                  |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/events/intel/p4.c                    |   2 +-
>  include/linux/perf_event.h                    |  18 ++-
>  kernel/events/core.c                          | 104 +++++++++++++++---
>  kernel/sysctl.c                               |   4 +-
>  kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c               |   6 +-
>  9 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ