linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V6 2/2] x86/efi: Add efi page fault handler to recover from page faults caused by the firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FFF73D592F13FD46B8700F0A279B802F485BB609@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:02:58 +0000
From:   "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        "Al Stone" <astone@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 2/2] x86/efi: Add efi page fault handler to recover
 from page faults caused by the firmware

> On 12 September 2018 at 20:56, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> >> index b18b2d864c2c..7455277a3b65 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c
> >> @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work;
> >>  ({                                                                   \
> >>       efi_rts_work.status = EFI_ABORTED;                              \
> >>                                                                       \
> >> +     if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) {                       \
> >> +             pr_info("Aborting! EFI Runtime Services disabled\n");   \
> >
> > This probaby wants to be pr_info_ince().
> >

Yes.. that makes sense.

> 
> I can fix that up when applying.
>

Thanks a lot! Ard.
 
> > Other than that:
> >
> >       Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> Thanks! I will queue this up in efi/next