[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E4626316-0683-45DF-9F09-D602FC982E21@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:55:44 +0200
From: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
To: faisal.latif@...el.com, shiraz.saleem@...el.com
Cc: OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
anjali.singhai@...el.com,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
Subject: mutex and rcu list traversal idiosyncrasy
Hi Faisal,
In commit f27b4746f378 ("i40iw: add connection management code") you have in i40iw_add_mqh_6():
rtnl_lock();
for_each_netdev_rcu(...) {
[]
}
rtnl_unlock();
Shouldn't this read:
rtnl_lock();
for_each_netdev(...) {
[]
}
rtnl_unlock();
or
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_netdev_rcu(...) {
[]
}
rcu_read_unlock();
?
Thx, Håkon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists