[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0ZBBL8LHoV=tDr3Ner6wRK=QcrepciZqCPNEHk=B2n7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 18:09:35 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
c-sky_gcc_upstream@...ky.com, gnu-csky@...tor.com,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
wbx@...ibc-ng.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/27] C-SKY(csky) Linux Kernel Port
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:02 PM Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:46:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:37 PM Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com> wrote:
>
> > One level below that, you can of course choose to build
> > a distro with only 64-bit time_t regardless of whether there
> > is still support for 32-bit time_t in kernel and glibc or not.
> Do you mean I could merge kernel port into linux-4.19 or linux-4.20.
> But let glibc merged after linux-4.21 and csky glibc only support
> time64 syscalls ?
Yes, that's what I meant. Note that it won't get merged into 4.19:
the merge window for that was after the 4.18 release and no
new features are getting merged for 4.19 that have not made it
into 4.19-rc1 already.
Getting your code into linux-next now is the prerequisite for you
sending a pull request during the 4.20 window.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists