linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 00/27] C-SKY(csky) Linux Kernel Port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180914232826.GA1497@guoren-Inspiron-7460>
Date:   Sat, 15 Sep 2018 07:28:26 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        c-sky_gcc_upstream@...ky.com, gnu-csky@...tor.com,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        wbx@...ibc-ng.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/27] C-SKY(csky) Linux Kernel Port

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 06:09:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:02 PM Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 04:46:56PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:37 PM Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com> wrote:
> >
> > > One level below that, you can of course choose to build
> > > a distro with only 64-bit time_t regardless of whether there
> > > is still support for 32-bit time_t in kernel and glibc or not.
> > Do you mean I could merge kernel port into linux-4.19 or linux-4.20.
> > But let glibc merged after linux-4.21 and csky glibc only support
> > time64 syscalls ?
> 
> Yes, that's what I meant. Note that it won't get merged into 4.19:
> the merge window for that was after the 4.18 release and no
> new features are getting merged for 4.19 that have not made it
> into 4.19-rc1 already.
> 
> Getting your code into linux-next now is the prerequisite for you
> sending a pull request during the 4.20 window.
Got it, thank you very much.

 Guo Ren