[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3932568.1d4PiNsIum@phil>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:55:12 +0200
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, vicencb@...il.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
enric.balletbo@...labora.com, pbrobinson@...il.com, tom@...rs.com,
dev@...rs.com, stephen@...rs.com, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add 96Boards Rock960 CE board support
Am Freitag, 14. September 2018, 19:42:51 CEST schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
> On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 23:35 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > This patchset adds 96Boards Rock960 CE board support. Rock960 CE
> > (Consumer Edition) board is one of the member of 96Boards Consumer
> > Edition and AI platform and is manufactured by Vamrs Limited. Most of
> > the board configuration is shared with the Ficus board manufactured by
> > vamrs, which is an Enterprise 96Board.
> >
> > For the sake of avoiding code duplication, a common rock960.dtsi file
> > with common DT nodes for both boards and separate board specific DTS
> > files has been added.
> >
> > To be specific, below are some of the key differences between both
> > boards:
> >
> > 1. Different host enable GPIO for USB
> > 2. Different power and reset GPIO for PCI-E
> > 3. No Ethernet port on Rock960
> >
> > While adding the board support, SD card Chip detection support is also
> > added to the common dtsi file, shared by both boards.
> >
> > This series has been tested on Rock960 CE v1.2 board.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> >
> > * Moved usb and pcie nodes to common dtsi and kept only the properties
> > which differ in board specific dts.
> > * Updated the common dtsi commit description.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> >
> > * Changed the board compatible to "vamrs,rock960"
> >
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam (4):
> > arm64: dts: rockchip: Split out common nodes for Rock960 based boards
> > dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add binding for Rock960 board
> > arm64: boot: dts: rockchip: Add support for Rock960 board
> > arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable SD card detection for Rock960 boards
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 +
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-ficus.dts | 524 +----------------
> > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts | 52 ++
> > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi | 542 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 519 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi
> >
>
> Looks pretty good!
>
> When applying this series, I noticed that it conflicts with
>
> commit 8bb878cf20ae10809c36db96993bfce7026d062b
> Author: Levin Du <djw@...hip.com.cn>
> Date: Mon Jul 30 10:12:01 2018 +0800
>
> arm64: dts: rockchip: add support for ROC-RK3399-PC board
>
> resolution is trivial, but you might want to rebase and resend,
> to make Heiko's life easier.
nah, that's ok as it is ;-)
Such a Makefile conflict I can fix up myself.
As it looks pretty good, I'd like to just give Rob a chance
to look at the added binding before applying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists