linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add 96Boards Rock960 CE board support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:55:12 +0200
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, vicencb@...il.com, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
        enric.balletbo@...labora.com, pbrobinson@...il.com, tom@...rs.com,
        dev@...rs.com, stephen@...rs.com, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add 96Boards Rock960 CE board support

Am Freitag, 14. September 2018, 19:42:51 CEST schrieb Ezequiel Garcia:
> On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 23:35 +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > This patchset adds 96Boards Rock960 CE board support. Rock960 CE
> > (Consumer Edition) board is one of the member of 96Boards Consumer
> > Edition and AI platform and is manufactured by Vamrs Limited. Most of
> > the board configuration is shared with the Ficus board manufactured by
> > vamrs, which is an Enterprise 96Board.
> > 
> > For the sake of avoiding code duplication, a common rock960.dtsi file
> > with common DT nodes for both boards and separate board specific DTS
> > files has been added.
> > 
> > To be specific, below are some of the key differences between both
> > boards:
> > 
> > 1. Different host enable GPIO for USB
> > 2. Different power and reset GPIO for PCI-E
> > 3. No Ethernet port on Rock960
> > 
> > While adding the board support, SD card Chip detection support is also
> > added to the common dtsi file, shared by both boards.
> > 
> > This series has been tested on Rock960 CE v1.2 board.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > 
> > * Moved usb and pcie nodes to common dtsi and kept only the properties
> >   which differ in board specific dts.
> > * Updated the common dtsi commit description.
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 
> > * Changed the board compatible to "vamrs,rock960"
> > 
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam (4):
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: Split out common nodes for Rock960 based boards
> >   dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add binding for Rock960 board
> >   arm64: boot: dts: rockchip: Add support for Rock960 board
> >   arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable SD card detection for Rock960 boards
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt      |   4 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile         |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-ficus.dts | 524 +----------------
> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts      |  52 ++
> >  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi     | 542 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 519 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dts
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-rock960.dtsi
> > 
> 
> Looks pretty good!
> 
> When applying this series, I noticed that it conflicts with
> 
> commit 8bb878cf20ae10809c36db96993bfce7026d062b
> Author: Levin Du <djw@...hip.com.cn>
> Date:   Mon Jul 30 10:12:01 2018 +0800
> 
>     arm64: dts: rockchip: add support for ROC-RK3399-PC board
> 
> resolution is trivial, but you might want to rebase and resend,
> to make Heiko's life easier.

nah, that's ok as it is ;-)
Such a Makefile conflict I can fix up myself.

As it looks pretty good, I'd like to just give Rob a chance
to look at the added binding before applying.