[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a03qF4+yGBNVLymrSRN7QjDGjnpduoPwnprwv+kfHZ0Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 21:55:21 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] making uapi/linux/elfcore.h useful again
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:45 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > - Move required data from the private x86 asm/elf.h file into
> > a new uapi/asm/elf.h. Some other architectures already do that,
> > but most of them do not. Before applying the patch, we have
> > to do this for all architectures
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Thanks,
> I suspect this wants to go through -mm, or do you want to carry it?
-mm is probably best. For now, I just want to see if there are any
concerns about this, and then I'd have to do the full version that
changes all architectures.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists