[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5B9E6F1F.5030908@huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 22:56:31 +0800
From: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: <kronos.it@...il.com>, <jdelvare@...e.com>,
<linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO instead of reimplementing
its function
On 2018/9/16 8:43, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:03:37PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO has implemented the same function. We prefer to use
>> inlined function rather than code-opened implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
> Applied to hwmon-next. For future patches, please also refer to the
> affected driver in the Subject line, unless the change is in the
> subsystem core code.
Get it. Thanks.
Sincerely,
zhong jiang
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c b/drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c
>> index a6636fe..a7cf008 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/asus_atk0110.c
>> @@ -1210,10 +1210,8 @@ static int atk_register_hwmon(struct atk_data *data)
>> data->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register_with_groups(dev, "atk0110",
>> data,
>> data->attr_groups);
>> - if (IS_ERR(data->hwmon_dev))
>> - return PTR_ERR(data->hwmon_dev);
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(data->hwmon_dev);
>> }
>>
>> static int atk_probe_if(struct atk_data *data)
>> --
>> 1.7.12.4
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists