lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:38:20 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>,
        tsoni@...eaurora.org, Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
        Tingwei Zhang <tingwei@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pstore: Add event tracing support

Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2018-09-11 03:46:01)
> On 9/9/2018 1:57 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> > +void notrace pstore_event_call(struct trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
> > +{
> > +     struct trace_iterator *iter;
> > +     struct trace_seq *s;
> > +     struct trace_event_call *event_call;
> > +     struct pstore_record record;
> > +     struct trace_event *event;
> > +     struct seq_buf *seq;
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +     if (!psinfo)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     if (unlikely(oops_in_progress))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     pstore_record_init(&record, psinfo);
> > +     record.type = PSTORE_TYPE_EVENT;
> > +
> > +     iter = kmalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!iter)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     event_call = fbuffer->trace_file->event_call;
> > +     if (!event_call || !event_call->event.funcs ||
> > +         !event_call->event.funcs->trace)
> > +             goto fail_event;
> > +
> > +     event = &fbuffer->trace_file->event_call->event;
> > +
> > +     spin_lock_irqsave(&psinfo->buf_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +     trace_seq_init(&iter->seq);
> > +     iter->ent = fbuffer->entry;
> > +     event_call->event.funcs->trace(iter, 0, event);
> > +     trace_seq_putc(&iter->seq, 0);
> > +
> > +     if (seq->size > psinfo->bufsize)
> > +             seq->size = psinfo->bufsize;
> > +
> > +     s = &iter->seq;
> > +     seq = &s->seq;
> > +
> > +     record.buf = (char *)(seq->buffer);
> > +     record.size = seq->len;
> > +     psinfo->write(&record);
> > +
> > +     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&psinfo->buf_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +fail_event:
> > +     kfree(iter);
> > +}
> > +
> > 
> 
> When tracing sched events on sdm845 mtp, I hit below bug repeatedly.
> Seems like pstore_event_call can be called in atomic context.
> I will respin the below fix in next version of the patch.
> Reviews on other parts would be appreciated, thanks.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ftrace.c b/fs/pstore/ftrace.c
> index d47dc93ac098..a497cf782ee8 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ftrace.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ftrace.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ void notrace pstore_event_call(struct 
> trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
>          struct trace_event *event;
>          struct seq_buf *seq;
>          unsigned long flags;
> +       gfp_t gfpflags;
> 
>          if (!psinfo)
>                  return;
> @@ -83,7 +84,9 @@ void notrace pstore_event_call(struct 
> trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
>          pstore_record_init(&record, psinfo);
>          record.type = PSTORE_TYPE_EVENT;
> 
> -       iter = kmalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       gfpflags = (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) ? GFP_ATOMIC : 
> GFP_KERNEL;
> +

Do you need to allocate at all? Can you throw the iter on the stack?

Using in_atomic() and irqs_disabled() to figure out if an atomic or a
non-atomic allocation should be used is not a good solution.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ