[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03d47d84-a237-a94e-04ee-4447d8620697@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 01:13:30 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>,
tsoni@...eaurora.org, Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Tingwei Zhang <tingwei@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pstore: Add event tracing support
On 9/17/2018 11:08 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2018-09-11 03:46:01)
>> On 9/9/2018 1:57 AM, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>>> +void notrace pstore_event_call(struct trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
>>> +{
>>> + struct trace_iterator *iter;
>>> + struct trace_seq *s;
>>> + struct trace_event_call *event_call;
>>> + struct pstore_record record;
>>> + struct trace_event *event;
>>> + struct seq_buf *seq;
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> + if (!psinfo)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(oops_in_progress))
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + pstore_record_init(&record, psinfo);
>>> + record.type = PSTORE_TYPE_EVENT;
>>> +
>>> + iter = kmalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!iter)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + event_call = fbuffer->trace_file->event_call;
>>> + if (!event_call || !event_call->event.funcs ||
>>> + !event_call->event.funcs->trace)
>>> + goto fail_event;
>>> +
>>> + event = &fbuffer->trace_file->event_call->event;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&psinfo->buf_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> + trace_seq_init(&iter->seq);
>>> + iter->ent = fbuffer->entry;
>>> + event_call->event.funcs->trace(iter, 0, event);
>>> + trace_seq_putc(&iter->seq, 0);
>>> +
>>> + if (seq->size > psinfo->bufsize)
>>> + seq->size = psinfo->bufsize;
>>> +
>>> + s = &iter->seq;
>>> + seq = &s->seq;
>>> +
>>> + record.buf = (char *)(seq->buffer);
>>> + record.size = seq->len;
>>> + psinfo->write(&record);
>>> +
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&psinfo->buf_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +fail_event:
>>> + kfree(iter);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>
>>
>> When tracing sched events on sdm845 mtp, I hit below bug repeatedly.
>> Seems like pstore_event_call can be called in atomic context.
>> I will respin the below fix in next version of the patch.
>> Reviews on other parts would be appreciated, thanks.
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ftrace.c b/fs/pstore/ftrace.c
>> index d47dc93ac098..a497cf782ee8 100644
>> --- a/fs/pstore/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/fs/pstore/ftrace.c
>> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ void notrace pstore_event_call(struct
>> trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
>> struct trace_event *event;
>> struct seq_buf *seq;
>> unsigned long flags;
>> + gfp_t gfpflags;
>>
>> if (!psinfo)
>> return;
>> @@ -83,7 +84,9 @@ void notrace pstore_event_call(struct
>> trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
>> pstore_record_init(&record, psinfo);
>> record.type = PSTORE_TYPE_EVENT;
>>
>> - iter = kmalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + gfpflags = (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled()) ? GFP_ATOMIC :
>> GFP_KERNEL;
>> +
>
Hi Stephen
Thanks for the comments.
> Do you need to allocate at all? Can you throw the iter on the stack?
>
Yes since we need to copy the contents to pstore buffer.
> Using in_atomic() and irqs_disabled() to figure out if an atomic or a
> non-atomic allocation should be used is not a good solution.
>
I took reference from a similar use by graph_trace_open() which can be
called in atomic context via ftrace_dump(). I am open to correct this if
there is some other way.
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists