[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8621eb6d-b252-4fb3-cb67-294f0aafb54c@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:14:43 +0200
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: retrieve digest size of unknown algorithms
with PCR read
On 9/17/2018 11:16 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:02:56PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>> This code has the same behavior of tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(). If some
>> banks are not used, set the algorithm of the first unused to
>> TPM_ALG_ERROR.
>
> My point is that maybe it would sense to use zero for that in order
> to make code a bit simpler.
Wouldn't be better to compare data with the same type? Since the alg_id
structure member stores an algorithm, it should be fine to compare its
value with an algorithm.
No problem to change that, but probably I should modify also
tpm_pcr_extend().
Roberto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists