[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180918185433.GA9177@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 21:54:33 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] tpm: retrieve digest size of unknown algorithms
with PCR read
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:14:43AM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 9/17/2018 11:16 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:02:56PM +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > This code has the same behavior of tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(). If some
> > > banks are not used, set the algorithm of the first unused to
> > > TPM_ALG_ERROR.
> >
> > My point is that maybe it would sense to use zero for that in order
> > to make code a bit simpler.
>
> Wouldn't be better to compare data with the same type? Since the alg_id
> structure member stores an algorithm, it should be fine to compare its
> value with an algorithm.
>
> No problem to change that, but probably I should modify also
> tpm_pcr_extend().
>
> Roberto
Please do.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists