[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23698.1537289705@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:55:05 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
jmorris@...ei.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] KEYS: Support TPM-wrapped key and crypto ops
Denis Kenzior <denkenz@...il.com> wrote:
> In theory the PEM file already contains the type of the certificate, at least
> at a high level. E.g. private, public, tpm. So if we accept PEM files
> directly that could be potentially a faster way of determining the parser to
> use and would still work with keyctl update/instantiate, right?
Yes. It shouldn't be much code, either. You still have to check for X.509
DER since the kernel currently supports that.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists