[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180919084002.GR14465@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:40:02 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
casey.g.bowman@...el.com,
"Atwood, Matthew S" <matthew.s.atwood@...el.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Do pin translation in other GPIO
operations as well
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 03:14:44PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Also consider fixing the checkpatch warning:
>
> Errors:
> * checkpatch.pl errors/warnings
>
> WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
> #48: FILE: drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:764:
> +static int intel_gpio_to_pin(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
> unsigned offset,
Right, it is currently the "convention" used in Intel pinctrl drivers so
I did not want to change that single entry.
We should eventually convert the whole set of Intel pinctrl drivers to
use unsigned int instead of unsigned.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists