linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Do pin translation in other GPIO operations as well

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACK8Z6HCqN83rtEsV0EzSUcYdkq2Fx+QmOBrtW+ud5V4-ucCvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:35:22 -0700
From:   Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        casey.g.bowman@...el.com,
        "Atwood, Matthew S" <matthew.s.atwood@...el.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: Do pin translation in other GPIO
 operations as well

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 1:40 AM Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 03:14:44PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> > Also consider fixing the checkpatch warning:
> >
> >         Errors:
> >             * checkpatch.pl errors/warnings
> >
> >             WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
> >             #48: FILE: drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:764:
> >             +static int intel_gpio_to_pin(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
> > unsigned offset,
>
> Right, it is currently the "convention" used in Intel pinctrl drivers so
> I did not want to change that single entry.
>
> We should eventually convert the whole set of Intel pinctrl drivers to
> use unsigned int instead of unsigned.

OK, Thanks for the clarification.