linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Remove LM3697

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180920220443.GB27468@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:04:43 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Remove LM3697

Hi!

> >>> Easy to maintain will be a dedicated LED class driver.
> >>
> >> You mean, 3 dedicated LED class drivers and 3 MFD drivers with LED
> >> parts? We'll need complex driver anyway, and I'd really like to have
> >> just one.
> > 
> > In the LED subsystem we can wrap common functionalities
> > into a library object. MFD driver will be able to reuse it then.
> 
> I am currently working on that code now.  I expect a RFC on this this week.

Looking forward to that.

But you really need acks for the bindings, and since Rob is usually quite slow
acking them, it is easiest to use the existing binding... if it is wrong it
needs to be fixed, anyway.

THanks,

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html