linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: add ledtrig support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180920220449.GC27468@xo-6d-61-c0.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:04:49 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc:     Aditya Prayoga <aditya@...ol.io>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: add ledtrig support

Hi!

> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ATA_LEDS
> > > +	/* register LED triggers for all ports */
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
> > > +		if (unlikely(!host->ports[i]->ledtrig))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		snprintf(host->ports[i]->ledtrig_name,
> > > +			sizeof(host->ports[i]->ledtrig_name), "ata%u",
> > > +			host->ports[i]->print_id);
> > 
> > > +		host->ports[i]->ledtrig->name = host->ports[i]->ledtrig_name;
> > > +
> > > +		if (led_trigger_register(host->ports[i]->ledtrig)) {
> > > +			kfree(host->ports[i]->ledtrig);
> > > +			host->ports[i]->ledtrig = NULL;
> > > +		}
> > > +	}
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > No, we don't want you to register multiple triggers. We want one
> > trigger, than has parameter "which port to watch". (Number of triggers
> > is limited as by sysfs limitations).
> 
> Back then I implemented it that way to be able to define the
> default trigger for each LED in device tree and "trigger-sources"
> didn't exist yet (it was introduced for USB ports and isn't yet used
> for anything other than that)

I see why you did it... BUt I believe we still want single trigger solution...

> However, the problem till today is also that ATA ports are often not
> individual device-tree objects we can refer to, see for example
> marvell,armada-370-sata which appears as one opaque controller. Ie.
> all SATA drivers have to be converted to expose individual ports on
> device-tree before the trigger-sources approach can be applied...

Yep, well... something to do in SATA then.

Perhaps this should also have an option for single LED for _any_ SATA activity,
and 90% devices will be happy with that?

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html