[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32409e2a-533b-c317-5519-26e0993cd30e@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:39:22 +0800
From: lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com, tiwai@...e.de,
brijesh.singh@....com, dyoung@...hat.com,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem
resources
在 2018年09月19日 21:29, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 08:52:49PM +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> In fact, we should get the resource A and B when we walk through the
>> whole tree, but it only gets the resource A, the resource B is missed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
>
> Before looking at this: the SOB chain of all three patches is wrong.
> Hint: see section 12) in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
>
Thanks for your advice, Borislav.
I have discussed with Dave Young, and he suggested that i might add a Suggested-by
tag instead of Signed-off-by tag for him. What do you think about?
I will modify the invalid SOB chain and post it again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists