[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180920065935.GA11980@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:59:35 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com, tiwai@...e.de,
brijesh.singh@....com, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] resource: fix an error which walks through iomem
resources
On 09/20/18 at 02:39pm, lijiang wrote:
> 在 2018年09月19日 21:29, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 08:52:49PM +0800, Lianbo Jiang wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> In fact, we should get the resource A and B when we walk through the
> >> whole tree, but it only gets the resource A, the resource B is missed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lianbo Jiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
> >
> > Before looking at this: the SOB chain of all three patches is wrong.
> > Hint: see section 12) in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> >
> Thanks for your advice, Borislav.
>
> I have discussed with Dave Young, and he suggested that i might add a Suggested-by
patch 2 and patch 3 are based on my draft patch, but since you did debugging
and changes you can move my SOB to Suggested-by for patch 2 and patch 3,
for patch 1 please just drop my SOB and leave yours only.
> tag instead of Signed-off-by tag for him. What do you think about?
>
> I will modify the invalid SOB chain and post it again.
>
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists