[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180921132206.417f3714@xeon-e3>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:22:06 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next, v2, 1/3] hv_netvsc: Add support for LRO/RSC in
the vSwitch
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:51:54 +0000
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 2:37 PM
> > To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...uxonhyperv.com>
> > Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>; davem@...emloft.net;
> > netdev@...r.kernel.org; olaf@...fle.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > devel@...uxdriverproject.org; vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next, v2, 1/3] hv_netvsc: Add support for LRO/RSC in
> > the vSwitch
> >
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 18:20:35 +0000
> > Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...uxonhyperv.com> wrote:
> >
> > Overall, this looks good. Some minor suggestions.
> >
> > > +struct nvsc_rsc {
> > > + const struct ndis_pkt_8021q_info *vlan;
> > > + const struct ndis_tcp_ip_checksum_info *csum_info;
> > > + u8 is_last; /* last RNDIS msg in a vmtransfer_page */
> > > + u32 cnt; /* #fragments in an RSC packet */
> > > + u32 pktlen; /* Full packet length */
> > > + void *data[NVSP_RSC_MAX];
> > > + u32 len[NVSP_RSC_MAX];
> > > +};
> > > +
> >
> > This new state structure is state on a per-channel basis.
> > Do you really need this to be persistent across packets?
> >
> > Could this be on stack or do you need it to handle split packets arriving in
> > different polls? Or is the stack space a problem?
> >
> > Also, maybe data and length could be in one structure since they are related.
>
> The stack space is a problem. NVSP_RSC_MAX is 562, which is defined by host.
> It will be too large for limited stack space.
>
> struct nvsc_rsc includes the data, len, cnt, chksum, vlan for one RSC packet. They
> are all related to construction of one SKB and its meta data. So I put them in
> one structure.
>
> Thanks,
> - Haiyang
>
That makes sense. How big is sizeof(struct net_device) + netdev_priv now?
Need to make sure it doesn't become an order 2 (ie keep it less than 4K).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists