lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:31:07 -0400
From:   Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     freude@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        cohuck@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        bjsdjshi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, pmorel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        alifm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
        pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@...hat.com,
        fiuczy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@...ibm.com,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 25/26] KVM: s390: CPU model support for AP
 virtualization

On 09/12/2018 03:43 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> 
> Introduces a new CPU model feature and two CPU model
> facilities to support AP virtualization for KVM guests.
> 
> CPU model feature:
> 
> The KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP feature indicates that
> AP instructions are available on the guest. This
> feature will be enabled by the kernel only if the AP
> instructions are installed on the linux host. This feature
> must be specifically turned on for the KVM guest from
> userspace to use the VFIO AP device driver for guest
> access to AP devices.
> 
> CPU model facilities:
> 
> 1. AP Query Configuration Information (QCI) facility is installed.
> 
>     This is indicated by setting facilities bit 12 for
>     the guest. The kernel will not enable this facility
>     for the guest if it is not set on the host.
> 
>     If this facility is not set for the KVM guest, then only
>     APQNs with an APQI less than 16 will be used by a Linux
>     guest regardless of the matrix configuration for the virtual
>     machine. This is a limitation of the Linux AP bus.
> 
> 2. AP Facilities Test facility (APFT) is installed.
> 
>     This is indicated by setting facilities bit 15 for
>     the guest. The kernel will not enable this facility for
>     the guest if it is not set on the host.
> 
>     If this facility is not set for the KVM guest, then no
>     AP devices will be available to the guest regardless of
>     the guest's matrix configuration for the virtual
>     machine. This is a limitation of the Linux AP bus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |    5 +++++
>   arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c |    2 ++
>   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 286c2e0..f0b8e2a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -371,6 +371,11 @@ static void kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init(void)
>   
>   	if (MACHINE_HAS_ESOP)
>   		allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP);
> +
> +	/* Check if AP instructions installed on host */
> +	if (ap_instructions_available())
> +		allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP);
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * We need SIE support, ESOP (PROT_READ protection for gmap_shadow),
>   	 * 64bit SCAO (SCA passthrough) and IDTE (for gmap_shadow unshadowing).
> diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c b/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c
> index 0c85aed..fd788e0 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ struct facility_def {
>   
>   		.name = "FACILITIES_KVM_CPUMODEL",
>   		.bits = (int[]){
> +			12, /* AP Query Configuration Information */
> +			15, /* AP Facilities Test */
>   			156, /* etoken facility */
>   			-1  /* END */
>   		}
> 

The fixup! patch below modifies this patch (25/26) to illustrate how
David's recommendation will be implemented for v11 of the series. It
is one of three fixup! patches (the other two are in responses to
03/26 and 11/26) included to generate discussion in v10 rather than
waiting until v11 for comments.

-----------------------------------8<-----------------------------------

From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:28:07 -0400
Subject: [FIXUP v10] fixup!: KVM: s390: CPU model support for AP 
virtualization

---
  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c |    4 ----
  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index a3a7cd9..ff38251 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -372,10 +372,6 @@ static void kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init(void)
  	if (MACHINE_HAS_ESOP)
  		allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP);

-	/* Check if AP instructions installed on host */
-	if (ap_instructions_available())
-		allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP);
-
  	/*
  	 * We need SIE support, ESOP (PROT_READ protection for gmap_shadow),
  	 * 64bit SCAO (SCA passthrough) and IDTE (for gmap_shadow unshadowing).
-- 
1.7.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ