linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 37/48] perf record: Introduce struct record

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180923193145.GE30923@krava>
Date:   Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:31:45 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
        kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 37/48] perf record: Introduce struct record_thread

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 08:26:15PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 02:54:39PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Adding struct record_thread to carry the single thread's maps.
> > 
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-dsyi97xdc7ullvsisqmha0ca@git.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 179 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > index 1b01cb4d06b8..5c6b56f164a9 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > @@ -65,6 +65,15 @@ struct switch_output {
> >  	bool		 set;
> >  };
> >  
> > +struct record_thread {
> > +	struct perf_mmap	**mmap;
> > +	int			  mmap_nr;
> > +	struct perf_mmap	**ovw_mmap;
> > +	int			  ovw_mmap_nr;
> > +	struct fdarray		  pollfd;
> > +	struct record		 *rec;
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct record {
> >  	struct perf_tool	tool;
> >  	struct record_opts	opts;
> > @@ -83,6 +92,8 @@ struct record {
> >  	bool			timestamp_boundary;
> >  	struct switch_output	switch_output;
> >  	unsigned long long	samples;
> > +	struct record_thread	*threads;
> > +	int			threads_cnt;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static volatile int auxtrace_record__snapshot_started;
> > @@ -967,6 +978,166 @@ static int record__synthesize(struct record *rec, bool tail)
> >  	return err;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void
> > +record_thread__clean(struct record_thread *th)
> > +{
> > +	free(th->mmap);
> > +	free(th->ovw_mmap);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +record__threads_clean(struct record *rec)
> > +{
> > +	struct record_thread *threads = rec->threads;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	if (threads) {
> > +		for (i = 0; i < rec->threads_cnt; i++)
> > +			record_thread__clean(threads + i);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void record_thread__init(struct record_thread *th, struct record *rec)
> > +{
> > +	memset(th, 0, sizeof(*th));
> > +	fdarray__init(&th->pollfd, 64);
> > +	th->rec = rec;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +record_thread__mmap(struct record_thread *th, int nr, int nr_ovw)
> > +{
> > +	struct perf_mmap **mmap;
> > +
> > +	mmap = zalloc(sizeof(*mmap) * nr);
> > +	if (!mmap)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	th->mmap    = mmap;
> > +	th->mmap_nr = nr;
> > +
> > +	if (nr_ovw) {
> > +		mmap = zalloc(sizeof(*mmap) * nr_ovw);
> > +		if (!mmap)
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +		th->ovw_mmap    = mmap;
> > +		th->ovw_mmap_nr = nr;
> 
> s/nr;/nr_ovw;/ ?

right, thanks

> 
> 
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +record__threads_assign(struct record *rec)
> > +{
> > +	struct record_thread *threads = rec->threads;
> > +	struct record_thread *thread0 = threads;
> > +	struct perf_evlist *evlist = rec->evlist;
> > +	int i, j, nr, nr0, nr_ovw, nr_trk;
> > +	int ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	nr     = evlist->mmap           ? evlist->nr_mmaps : 0;
> > +	nr_trk = evlist->track_mmap     ? evlist->nr_mmaps : 0;
> > +	nr_ovw = evlist->overwrite_mmap ? evlist->nr_mmaps : 0;
> > +
> > +	nr0  = nr_trk;
> > +	nr0 += nr;
> > +
> > +	if (record_thread__mmap(thread0, nr0, nr_ovw))
> > +		goto out_error;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < nr_ovw; i++)
> > +		thread0->ovw_mmap[i] = &evlist->overwrite_mmap[i];
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < nr_trk; i++)
> > +		thread0->mmap[i] = &evlist->track_mmap[i];
> > +
> > +	for (j = 0; i < nr0 && j < nr; i++, j++)
> > +		thread0->mmap[i] = &evlist->mmap[j];
> 
> I'm not sure it'll work with the overwrite mmap well..

as you said in the later email, there's no support
for threads and overwrite mode

thanks,
jirka