linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 39/48] perf record: Move waking into struct record

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180923193600.GG30923@krava>
Date:   Sun, 23 Sep 2018 21:36:00 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
        kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 39/48] perf record: Move waking into struct record

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 08:31:31PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 02:54:41PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > We need to keep global number of 'waking' now.
> > 
> > TODO: make this multiple threads safe.
> 
> Why not using atomic APIs?

that would solve it, will check

thanks,
jirka