linux-kernel - Re: block: DMA alignment of IO buffer allocated from slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:56:18 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: block: DMA alignment of IO buffer allocated from slab

On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 11:57 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 09:19:44AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > That means that two buffers allocated with kmalloc() may share a cache line on
> > x86-64. Since it is allowed to use a buffer allocated by kmalloc() for DMA, can
> > this lead to data corruption, e.g. if the CPU writes into one buffer allocated
> > with kmalloc() and a device performs a DMA write to another kmalloc() buffer and
> > both write operations affect the same cache line?
> 
> You're not supposed to use kmalloc memory for DMA.  This is why we have
> dma_alloc_coherent() and friends.

Are you claiming that all drivers that use DMA should use coherent DMA only? If
coherent DMA is the only DMA style that should be used, why do the following
function pointers exist in struct dma_map_ops?

	void (*sync_single_for_cpu)(struct device *dev,
				    dma_addr_t dma_handle, size_t size,
				    enum dma_data_direction dir);
	void (*sync_single_for_device)(struct device *dev,
				       dma_addr_t dma_handle, size_t size,
				       enum dma_data_direction dir);
	void (*sync_sg_for_cpu)(struct device *dev,
				struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
				enum dma_data_direction dir);
	void (*sync_sg_for_device)(struct device *dev,
				   struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
				   enum dma_data_direction dir);

Thanks,

Bart.