linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/6] f2fs: fix to recover inode's i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180925073603.102125-2-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:35:59 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] f2fs: fix to recover inode's i_flags during POR

Testcase to reproduce this bug:
1. mkfs.f2fs /dev/sdd
2. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
3. touch /mnt/f2fs/file
4. sync
5. chattr +A /mnt/f2fs/file
6. xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fsync"
7. godown /mnt/f2fs
8. umount /mnt/f2fs
9. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
10. lsattr /mnt/f2fs/file

-----------------N- /mnt/f2fs/file

But actually, we expect the corrct result is:

-------A---------N- /mnt/f2fs/file

The reason is we didn't recover inode.i_flags field during mount,
fix it.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index c7e292f21b64..4a0f49654573 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int recover_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
 	inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec = le32_to_cpu(raw->i_mtime_nsec);
 
 	F2FS_I(inode)->i_advise = raw->i_advise;
+	F2FS_I(inode)->i_flags = le32_to_cpu(raw->i_flags);
 
 	recover_inline_flags(inode, raw);
 
-- 
2.18.0.rc1