[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180925073603.102125-1-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:35:58 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] f2fs: fix to recover inode's project id during POR
Testcase to reproduce this bug:
1. mkfs.f2fs -O extra_attr -O project_quota /dev/sdd
2. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
3. touch /mnt/f2fs/file
4. sync
5. chattr -p 1 /mnt/f2fs/file
6. xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fsync"
7. godown /mnt/f2fs
8. umount /mnt/f2fs
9. mount -t f2fs /dev/sdd /mnt/f2fs
10. lsattr -p /mnt/f2fs/file
0 -----------------N- /mnt/f2fs/file
But actually, we expect the correct result is:
1 -----------------N- /mnt/f2fs/file
The reason is we didn't recover inode.i_projid field during mount,
fix it.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index 70f05650191e..c7e292f21b64 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -244,6 +244,19 @@ static int recover_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *page)
i_uid_write(inode, le32_to_cpu(raw->i_uid));
i_gid_write(inode, le32_to_cpu(raw->i_gid));
+
+ if (raw->i_inline & F2FS_EXTRA_ATTR) {
+ if (f2fs_sb_has_project_quota(F2FS_I_SB(inode)->sb) &&
+ F2FS_FITS_IN_INODE(raw, le16_to_cpu(raw->i_extra_isize),
+ i_projid)) {
+ projid_t i_projid;
+
+ i_projid = (projid_t)le32_to_cpu(raw->i_projid);
+ F2FS_I(inode)->i_projid =
+ make_kprojid(&init_user_ns, i_projid);
+ }
+ }
+
f2fs_i_size_write(inode, le64_to_cpu(raw->i_size));
inode->i_atime.tv_sec = le64_to_cpu(raw->i_atime);
inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = le64_to_cpu(raw->i_ctime);
--
2.18.0.rc1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists