[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN6PR1101MB2130115311A87CCF7D712B0FE7160@BN6PR1101MB2130.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:19:07 +0000
From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To: <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
<steve.glendinning@...well.net>, <keescook@...omium.org>,
<akurz@...la.de>, <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
<kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>, <grundler@...omium.org>,
<zhongjiang@...wei.com>, <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
<ran.wang_1@....com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 3/7] lan78xx: Check for supported Wake-on-LAN modes
Hi Florian,
> @@ -1415,6 +1415,9 @@ static int lan78xx_set_wol(struct net_device *netdev,
> if (wol->wolopts & WAKE_ARP)
> pdata->wol |= WAKE_ARP;
>
> + if (pdata->wol == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
It will make function return when disabling WOL.
Is there other place handling this scenario?
> device_set_wakeup_enable(&dev->udev->dev, (bool)wol->wolopts);
>
> phy_ethtool_set_wol(netdev->phydev, wol);
Thanks.
Woojung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists