lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <990D0DB4-35C7-4B7B-A938-2B984CD97E78@vt.edu>
Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:26:55 -0400
From:   Tong Zhang <ztong@...edu>
To:     tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
        ebiederm@...ssion.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, Dave.Martin@....com,
        wolffhardt.schwabe@....de, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wenbo.s@...sung.com
Subject: different capability from different namespace required for
 prctl_set_mm_exe_file

Kernel Version: 4.18.5

Problem Description:

We discovered inconsistent check when using prctl_set_mm_exe_file(), which is used to setup exe file link.

It is required to have capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) in prctl_set_mm().
while ns_capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) in prctl_set_mm_map().

There are two differences:
1)requiring capability from: user namespace, init namespace.
2)capability bit required is different


- Tong


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ