linux-kernel - Re: different capability from different namespace required for prctl_set_mm_exe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:37:45 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Tong Zhang <ztong@...edu>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net, gorcunov@...nvz.org,
        ebiederm@...ssion.com, keescook@...omium.org, Dave.Martin@....com,
        wolffhardt.schwabe@....de, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wenbo.s@...sung.com
Subject: Re: different capability from different namespace required for
 prctl_set_mm_exe_file

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 01:26:55PM -0400, Tong Zhang wrote:
> Kernel Version: 4.18.5
> 
> Problem Description:
> 
> We discovered inconsistent check when using prctl_set_mm_exe_file(), which is used to setup exe file link.
> 
> It is required to have capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) in prctl_set_mm().
> while ns_capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) in prctl_set_mm_map().
> 
> There are two differences:
> 1)requiring capability from: user namespace, init namespace.
> 2)capability bit required is different

Can you submit a patch showing what you think is the correct fix here?

thanks,

greg k-h