linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix core dump memory corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Sep 2018 10:39:58 -0700
From:   Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: Fix core dump memory corruption

On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 09:25 -0700, Yu, Yu-cheng wrote:
> In fill_note_info(), we kzalloc elf_thread_core_info.notes[] only
> for (core_note_type != 0) regsets.  However, in
> fill_thread_core_info(), we still leave empty notes and go beyond
> the allocated size.  Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
> ---
>  fs/binfmt_elf.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> index 816cc921cf36..6f42e05d2833 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
> @@ -1723,7 +1723,8 @@ static int fill_thread_core_info(struct
> elf_thread_core_info *t,
>                                  const struct user_regset_view *view,
>                                  long signr, size_t *total)
>  {
> -       unsigned int i;
> +       unsigned int i; /* index to regsets */
> +       unsigned int j; /* index to notes */
>         unsigned int regset0_size = regset_size(t->task, &view->regsets[0]);
> 
>         /*
> @@ -1744,9 +1745,9 @@ static int fill_thread_core_info(struct
> elf_thread_core_info *t,
> 
>         /*
>          * Each other regset might generate a note too.  For each regset
> -        * that has no core_note_type or is inactive, we leave t->notes[i]
> -        * all zero and we'll know to skip writing it later.
> +        * that has no core_note_type or is inactive, we skip it.
>          */
> +       j = 1;
>         for (i = 1; i < view->n; ++i) {
>                 const struct user_regset *regset = &view->regsets[i];
>                 do_thread_regset_writeback(t->task, regset);
> @@ -1763,17 +1764,18 @@ static int fill_thread_core_info(struct
> elf_thread_core_info *t,
>                                 kfree(data);
>                         else {
>                                 if (regset->core_note_type != NT_PRFPREG)
> -                                       fill_note(&t->notes[i], "LINUX",
> +                                       fill_note(&t->notes[j], "LINUX",
>                                                   regset->core_note_type,
>                                                   size, data);
>                                 else {
>                                         SET_PR_FPVALID(&t->prstatus,
>                                                         1, regset0_size);
> -                                       fill_note(&t->notes[i], "CORE",
> +                                       fill_note(&t->notes[j], "CORE",
>                                                   NT_PRFPREG, size, data);
>                                 }
> -                               *total += notesize(&t->notes[i]);
> +                               *total += notesize(&t->notes[j]);
>                         }
> +                       j++;
>                 }
>         }
> 
> --
> 2.17.1
> 

Hi All,

Any comments on this?

Thanks,
Yu-cheng