[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180925182459.GA21710@bogus>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:24:59 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@...wiler.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 26/34] dt-bindings: add broadcom (formerly plx
technology) vendor prefix
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 31.08.2018 um 18:38 schrieb Marcel Ziswiler:
> > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
> >
> > PLX Technology meanwhile got bought by Broadcom Corporation but the
> > vendor prefix plx is still used in 8 current device trees. This silences
> > the following checkpatch.pl warning:
> >
> > WARNING: DT compatible string vendor "plx" appears un-documented
> > -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
>
> Sounds sensible,
>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>
> You may want to tweak the subject though, it is slightly confusing as
> Broadcom already has a vendor prefix.
Yes, please.
With that,
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists