[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180926210339.GE22824@google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:03:39 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Andy Shevchenko Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 1/2] device property: Add device_get_bd_address()
and fwnode_get_bd_address()
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 02:36:25PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:10:13PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * fwnode_get_bd_address - Get the Bluetooth Device Address (BD_ADDR) from the
> > + * firmware node
> > + * @fwnode: Pointer to the firmware node
> > + * @bd_addr: Pointer to struct to store the BD address in
> > + *
> > + * Search the firmware node for 'local-bd-address'.
> > + *
> > + * All-zero BD addresses are rejected, because those could be properties
> > + * that exist in the firmware tables, but were not updated by the firmware. For
> > + * example, the DTS could define 'local-bd-address', with zero BD addresses.
> > + */
> > +int fwnode_get_bd_address(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, bdaddr_t *bd_addr)
> > +{
> > + bdaddr_t ba;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = fwnode_property_read_u8_array(fwnode, "local-bd-address",
> > + (u8 *)&ba, sizeof(bdaddr_t));
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + if (is_zero_ether_addr((u8 *)&ba))
> > + return -ENODATA;
> > +
> > + memcpy(bd_addr, &ba, sizeof(bdaddr_t));
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_get_bd_address);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * device_get_bd_address - Get the Bluetooth Device Address (BD_ADDR) for a
> > + * given device
> > + * @dev: Pointer to the device
> > + * @bd_addr: Pointer to struct to store the BD address in
> > + */
> > +int device_get_bd_address(struct device *dev, bdaddr_t *bd_addr)
> > +{
> > + return fwnode_get_bd_address(dev_fwnode(dev), bd_addr);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_bd_address);
>
> Let's not fill property.c with framework specific helper functions any
> more!
>
> Those functions are completely bluetooth specific, so they do not
> belong here. The fact that some other framework already managed to
> slip their helpers in does not justify others to do the same.
You have a point, I'll see if I can find a better place.
Thanks
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists