linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3.1 1/2] device property: Add device_get_bd_address() and fwnode_get_bd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vdwkovc+Myd9HSMUYxPdB_8TxqEY1JrCNSOhUwbTTpPEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:12:12 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, bgodavar@...eaurora.org,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 1/2] device property: Add device_get_bd_address() and fwnode_get_bd_address()

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:37 PM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 12:10:13PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

> Let's not fill property.c with framework specific helper functions any
> more!
>
> Those functions are completely bluetooth specific, so they do not
> belong here. The fact that some other framework already managed to
> slip their helpers in does not justify others to do the same.

Actually good point.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko