[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <284752d1-6c32-bdca-72d3-4d8616b26fbf@c-s.fr>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:41:26 +0200
From: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/64: add stack protector support
Le 26/09/2018 à 11:28, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>> Segher, any idea about this problem ?
>
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/bootx_init.o: In function `bootx_printf':
>>>> /var/lib/jenkins-slave/workspace/snowpatch/snowpatch-linux-
>>>> sparse/linux/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/bootx_init.c:88:
>>>> undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail_local'
>
> Are you building as PIC? Are you linking libssp_nonshared.a? Why not?
Spotted, thanks.
arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile contains:
CFLAGS_bootx_init.o += -fPIC
Does it mean we should add -lssp_nonshared to LDFLAGS_vmlinux ?
Or maybe stack protection on bootx_init doesn't make much sense and we
could just do the following ?
CFLAGS_bootx_init.o += -fPIC $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
Christophe
>
> :-)
>
>
> Segher
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists