[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o9ckfpek.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 21:50:59 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/64: add stack protector support
Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr> writes:
> Le 26/09/2018 à 11:28, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>>> Segher, any idea about this problem ?
>>
>>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/bootx_init.o: In function `bootx_printf':
>>>>> /var/lib/jenkins-slave/workspace/snowpatch/snowpatch-linux-
>>>>> sparse/linux/arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/bootx_init.c:88:
>>>>> undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail_local'
>>
>> Are you building as PIC? Are you linking libssp_nonshared.a? Why not?
>
> Spotted, thanks.
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile contains:
>
> CFLAGS_bootx_init.o += -fPIC
...
>
> Or maybe stack protection on bootx_init doesn't make much sense and we
> could just do the following ?
>
> CFLAGS_bootx_init.o += -fPIC $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
That would be fine by me.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists