[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3421929-1c40-513a-5c14-73e132a11d0f@axentia.se>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:44:50 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c-omap: Add new compatible for AM654
SoCs
On 2018-09-26 13:57, Vignesh R wrote:
> AM654 SoCs have similar I2C IP as OMAP SoCs. Add new compatible to
> handle AM654 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt
> index 7e49839d4124..11ce869d682d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-omap.txt
> @@ -2,7 +2,8 @@ I2C for OMAP platforms
>
> Required properties :
> - compatible : Must be "ti,omap2420-i2c", "ti,omap2430-i2c", "ti,omap3-i2c"
> - or "ti,omap4-i2c"
> + or "ti,omap4-i2c" for OMAP2+ SoCs
> +- compatible : Must "ti,am654-i2c", "ti,omap4-i2c" for AM654 SoCs
^
be
Also, it looks bad with two 'compatible' entries in the properties list.
I think the trend is to list one valid compatible (plus fallbacks)
per line. So, you should consider reformatting, possibly like so:
- compatible : Must be one of
"ti,omap2420-i2c"
"ti,omap2430-i2c"
"ti,omap3-i2c"
"ti,omap4-i2c"
"ti,am654-i2c", "ti,omap4-i2c"
Cheers,
Peter
> - ti,hwmods : Must be "i2c<n>", n being the instance number (1-based)
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <0>;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists