[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afd04dd4-4199-9bb8-1b21-11444bb1773a@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 16:02:07 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] PM / Domains: Export symbol for
genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_name
On 26/09/18 15:09, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 26 September 2018 at 14:27, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> wrote:
>> Export the symbol for genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_name() so that drivers
>> built as modules can call this function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> index 4b5714199490..b2bbe0d848d2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> @@ -2397,6 +2397,7 @@ struct device *genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_name(struct device *dev, char *name)
>>
>> return genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id(dev, index);
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_name);
>
> Driver's shouldn't be calling this function, but instead use
> dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name().
>
> Is there any problem with that?
No not at all. Yes that works, sorry it had been a while since I looked
at this and managed to balls it up. OK, I will drop this and correct the
API used by the driver.
Cheers!
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists