[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180927171305.GG22824@google.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:13:05 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Andy Shevchenko Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Bluetooth: Add device_get_bd_address()
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:47:06PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 9/27/2018 12:41 PM, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
> > void bt_sock_reclassify_lock(struct sock *sk, int proto);
> >
> > +int device_get_bd_address(struct device *dev, bdaddr_t *bd_addr);
>
> Maybe change the API name to start with bt_ and get rid of device_?
device_ indicates that we get the BD_ADDR for a 'struct device' and
not for e.g. a 'struct fwnode_handle'.
Anyway with this version of the patch fwnode_get_bd_address() has been
scrapped and it might never be introduced again, so I'm open to change
the name to bt_ if there is a general preference for it.
Cheers
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists