[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180927171451.7iqt2nt2log5qojf@flea>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 19:14:51 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] drm/sun4i: sun6i_mipi_dsi: Refactor vertical video
start delay
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:18:46PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> Accordingly to BPI-M64-bsp DE DSI code Video start delay
> can be computed by subtracting total vertical timing with
> front porch timing and with adding 1 delay line for TCON.
This is what the current code is doing as well.
> This patch simply add the start_delay logic from BPI-M64-bsp,
> w/o this new computation, the DSI on A64 encounter vblank time out.
>
> [CRTC:36:crtc-0] vblank wait timed out
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> index 9918fdb990ff..217db74c6dc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -358,7 +358,17 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_inst_init(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi,
> static u16 sun6i_dsi_get_video_start_delay(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi,
> struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> {
> - return mode->vtotal - (mode->vsync_end - mode->vdisplay) + 1;
> + u32 vfp = mode->vsync_start - mode->vdisplay;
Again, this is wrong and contrary to what your commit log is saying.
The Allwinner code has:
u32 vfp = panel->lcd_vt - panel->lcd_y - panel->lcd_vbp;
u32 dsi_start_delay = panel->lcd_vt - vfp + 1;
So, essentially:
vtotal - (vtotal - vdisplay - back porch) + 1
The backporch is hsync_total - hsync_end, so we end up, removing the
addition / removal of vtotal, with:
vdisplay - (vsync_total - vsync_end) + 1
The formula used there looks indeed different, but unlike what you
were saying.
> + u32 start_delay;
> +
> + start_delay = mode->vtotal - vfp + 1;
> + if (start_delay > mode->vtotal)
> + start_delay -= mode->vtotal;
> +
> + if (!start_delay)
> + start_delay = 1;
> +
I guess that it's actually the clamping that fixes thing. It should be
mentionned in your commit log.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists