[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180927181806.GI4222@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 11:18:06 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: shuah kh <shuah.kh@...sung.com>, rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rseq/selftests: fix parametrized test with -fpie
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 02:02:08PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> ----- On Sep 27, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Shuah Khan shuah.kh@...sung.com wrote:
>
> > On 09/27/2018 07:22 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
> >> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ----- On Sep 18, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> >>> mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On x86-64, the parametrized selftest code for rseq crashes with a
> >>>> segmentation fault when compiled with -fpie. This happens when the
> >>>> param_test binary is loaded at an address beyond 32-bit on x86-64.
> >>>>
> >>>> The issue is caused by use of a 32-bit register to hold the address
> >>>> of the loop counter variable.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fix this by using a 64-bit register to calculate the address of the
> >>>> loop counter variables as an offset from rip.
> >>>
> >>> Should this fix go through tip or the selftests tree ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> I usually have changes like this pulled through Shuah's tree with an
> >> ack from the maintainer of the code that it tests.
> >>
> >> -- Steve
> >>
> >
> > Right that is what I prefer. I usually wait for an Ack. I can pull this
> > in.
>
> I am maintainer of the code that it tests as well, so being both author
> of the selftest patch and giving an ack to it seems a bit silly. :) Other
> rseq co-maintainers could weight in though: Peter, Paul, and Boqun.
Here you go! ;-)
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > thanks,
> > -- Shuah
> >
> > --
> > Shuah Khan
> > Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
> > Open Source Innovation Group
> > Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
> > shuah.kh@...sung.com
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists