[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da7ed2a7-8e0f-3465-1662-e8e20735d9a6@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:26:54 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rseq/selftests: fix parametrized test with -fpie
On 09/27/2018 12:10 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 09/27/2018 12:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> ----- On Sep 27, 2018, at 9:58 AM, Shuah Khan shuah.kh@...sung.com wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/27/2018 07:22 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
>>>> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ----- On Sep 18, 2018, at 9:53 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>>>>> mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On x86-64, the parametrized selftest code for rseq crashes with a
>>>>>> segmentation fault when compiled with -fpie. This happens when the
>>>>>> param_test binary is loaded at an address beyond 32-bit on x86-64.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issue is caused by use of a 32-bit register to hold the address
>>>>>> of the loop counter variable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fix this by using a 64-bit register to calculate the address of the
>>>>>> loop counter variables as an offset from rip.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should this fix go through tip or the selftests tree ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I usually have changes like this pulled through Shuah's tree with an
>>>> ack from the maintainer of the code that it tests.
>>>>
>>>> -- Steve
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right that is what I prefer. I usually wait for an Ack. I can pull this
>>> in.
>>
>> I am maintainer of the code that it tests as well, so being both author
>> of the selftest patch and giving an ack to it seems a bit silly. :) Other
>> rseq co-maintainers could weight in though: Peter, Paul, and Boqun.
>>
>
> I was commenting in general, not specific to this patch. No worries. I will
> apply this right away.
>
> I have been traveling the last couple of weeks and in the catch up mode still.
>
Hmm. this patch doesn't apply to linux-kselftest fixes branch which is at 4.19-rc4.
Also you don't have my current email from getmaintainers.
Could you please rebase and send it to me.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists