lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180927222821.GC28301@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:28:21 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>, dledford@...hat.com,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx4: Avoid implicit enumerated type conversion

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:

> > Neither ib_qp_create_flags nor mlx4_ib_qp_flags have negative values, is
> > signedness necessary?
>
> enums are by default restricted to the range of ints.  

That's not quite right, the compiler sizes the enum to be able to fit
the largest value contained within, today that is int, but if we added
1<<31, then it would become larger.

Values intended to hold bitfields should always be unsigned, so u32 is
an appropriate for flags where the flags are defined in an enum.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ