[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180927100949.973078-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:09:26 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Frey <dpfrey@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC, altera: work around int-to-pointer-cast warnings
The altera edac driver passes a token from a DT resource as
resource_size_t into an SMC call, but casts it to an __iomem pointer
and then a plain void pointer inbetween, mixing three or four
incompatible types in the process. The compiler complains about
one of the conversions:
drivers/edac/altera_edac.c: In function 'altr_init_a10_ecc_block':
drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:1053:10: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
base = (void __iomem *)res.start;
^
drivers/edac/altera_edac.c: In function 'altr_edac_a10_probe':
drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:2062:10: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast]
base = (void __iomem *)res.start;
Using a static checker probably also notices the __iomem cast. Solving
this properly isn't trivial, but simply casting to a 'uintptr_t' instead
of 'void __iomem *' makes it less wrong and should avoid the warnings.
Fixes: d5fc9125566c ("EDAC, altera: Combine Stratix10 and Arria10 probe functions")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
index 0e9e80789d99..c89d82aa2776 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ altr_init_a10_ecc_block(struct device_node *np, u32 irq_mask,
} else {
struct device_node *sysmgr_np;
struct resource res;
- void __iomem *base;
+ uintptr_t base;
sysmgr_np = of_parse_phandle(np_eccmgr,
"altr,sysmgr-syscon", 0);
@@ -1050,9 +1050,9 @@ altr_init_a10_ecc_block(struct device_node *np, u32 irq_mask,
return -ENOMEM;
/* Need physical address for SMCC call */
- base = (void __iomem *)res.start;
+ base = res.start;
- ecc_mgr_map = regmap_init(NULL, NULL, base,
+ ecc_mgr_map = regmap_init(NULL, NULL, (void *)base,
&s10_sdram_regmap_cfg);
}
of_node_put(np_eccmgr);
@@ -2045,7 +2045,7 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
} else {
struct device_node *sysmgr_np;
struct resource res;
- void __iomem *base;
+ uintptr_t base;
sysmgr_np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
"altr,sysmgr-syscon", 0);
@@ -2059,9 +2059,10 @@ static int altr_edac_a10_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
/* Need physical address for SMCC call */
- base = (void __iomem *)res.start;
+ base = res.start;
- edac->ecc_mgr_map = devm_regmap_init(&pdev->dev, NULL, base,
+ edac->ecc_mgr_map = devm_regmap_init(&pdev->dev, NULL,
+ (void *)base,
&s10_sdram_regmap_cfg);
}
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists