linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7cf2d115-a58b-4585-37fc-7e58169a43a3@c-s.fr>
Date:   Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:30:22 +0200
From:   Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        me@...in.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: use correct pointer when 'btc' calls 'btt'



Le 27/09/2018 à 13:09, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr> writes:
>> Le 26/09/2018 à 13:11, Daniel Thompson a écrit :
>>> On 16/09/2018 20:06, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>>> On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:
>>>>> Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
> ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>>>>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.15+
>>>>
>>>> Would a Fixes: be better here?
>>>> Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
>>>
>>> Christophe, When you add the Fixes: could you also add my
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
>>
>> Ok, thanks for the review, but do I have to do anything really ?
>>
>> The Fixes: and now your Reviewed-by: appear automatically in patchwork
>> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=65715),
>> so I believe they'll be automatically included when Jason or someone
>> else takes the patch, no ?
> 
> patchwork won't add the Fixes tag from the reply, it needs to be in the
> original mail.
> 
> See:
>    https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/151
> 

Ok, so it accounts it and adds a '1' in the F column in the patches 
list, but won't take it into account.

Then I'll send a v2 with revised commit text.

Christophe