linux-kernel - Re: linux-mm@ archive on lore.kernel.org (Was: [PATCH 0/2] thp nodereclaim fixes)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:30:40 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Argangeli <andrea@...nel.org>,
        Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>,
        Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-mm@ archive on lore.kernel.org (Was: [PATCH 0/2] thp
 nodereclaim fixes)

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:25:23AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:08:50PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 02:03:24PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Thoughts, alternative patches?
> > > 
> > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180820032204.9591-1-aarcange@redhat.com
> > > [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180830064732.GA2656@dhcp22.suse.cz
> > > [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180820032640.9896-2-aarcange@redhat.com
> > 
> > All these links are broken. lore.kernel.org doesn't have linux-mm@ archive.
> > 
> > Can we get it added?
> 
> Adding linux-mm to lore.kernel.org certainly should happen, but it will not
> fix the above problem, because lkml.kernel.org/r/<foo> links only work for
> messages on LKML, not for all messages passing through vger lists (hence the
> word "lkml" in the name).

What is the reason for the separation? From my POV it's beneficial to have
single url scheme to refer any message in the archive regardless of the
list.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov