[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180927125141.GA3439@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:51:41 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] x86, perf: Add a separate Arch Perfmon v4 PMI
handler
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:12:07AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> @@ -4325,6 +4428,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_skl_extra_regs;
> x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_skl;
> x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
> + x86_pmu.counter_freezing = disable_counter_freezing ?
> + false : true;
> /* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
> x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
> x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_NO_HT_SHARING;
How about so instead? It is very much tied to the perfmon version, not
the FMS.
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -4049,6 +4049,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
max((int)edx.split.num_counters_fixed, assume);
}
+ if (version >= 4)
+ x86_pmu.counter_freezing = !disable_counter_freezing;
+
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM)) {
u64 capabilities;
@@ -4428,8 +4431,6 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_skl_extra_regs;
x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_skl;
x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
- x86_pmu.counter_freezing = disable_counter_freezing ?
- false : true;
/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_NO_HT_SHARING;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists