[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180927145745.GD3439@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:57:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, len.brown@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Rename Denverton and Gemini Lake
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Subject: x86/cpu: Sanitize FAM6_ATOM naming
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 10:17:27 -0700
> >
> > Going primarily by:
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors#Silvermont_microarchitecture
> >
> > with additional information gleaned from other related pages; notably:
> >
> > - Bonnell shrink was called Saltwell
> > - Moorefield is the Merriefield refresh which makes it Airmont
> >
> > The general naming scheme is: FAM6_ATOM_UARCH_SOCTYPE
> >
> > Cc: x86@...nel.org
> > Cc: mingo@...hat.com
> > Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com
> > Cc: tglx@...utronix.de
> > Cc: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
> > Cc: len.brown@...el.com
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Which way do we route that?
I have it stuck in with some perf patches, does that work?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists